Though it can be excused in some contexts, in a society standpoint, it is a paper-thin excuse veiled in hate. Exposure to diversity, on the contrary, is the basis for relativism and tolerance; when you are forced to face and accept the Other as real, unavoidable, and ultimately valuable, you cannot help but… 551 Words 3 Pages behaviors are related to two important concepts known as ethnocentrism and cultural relativity. Political scientist has argued that most debates over moral relativism misunderstand the importance of cultural relativism. Though they both come from a different culture. Cultural Relativism is defined as the perspective that any aspect of a culture must be viewed and evaluated within the context of that culture.
An example of cultural relativism might include slang words from specific languages and even from particular dialects within a language. Locally, it is argued that the practice has cultural roots, but such a practice has raised concerns among many international human rights organizations. How a language affects the way we think about the world is called linguistic relativism or the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Cultural relativism refers to not judging a culture to our own standards of what is right or wrong, strange or normal. It is sometimes difficult for someone like Casey to call some acts wrong. When they were both asked if one would do what the other practices, they both thought the opposite custom was dreadful.
These environmental organizations say that there are not many whales left and such fishing practices should be stopped. The ethnocentric individual will judge other groups relative to his or her own particular ethnic group or culture, especially with concern to language, behavior, customs, and religion. The differences and similarities observed between various cultures determine the way the people of those cultures interact with each other. Theocentrism is similar to ethnocentrism in that it posits the existence of an absolute value system. Lewis 1983 documents that even after the geographical puzzle was fixed, a cultural puzzle continued. The main character walks into the high school cafeteria, and sees the students sitting in a particular arrangement: the jocks, the mean girls, the nerds, the band geeks, the stoners, the goths.
What these different positions have in common, Geertz argued, is that they are all responding to the same thing: knowledge about other ways of life. Importantly, there are also three levels of ethnocentrism: a positive one, a negative one, and an extreme negative one. These are all examples of cultural and linguistic differences and the importance of understanding language and culture. This is ethnocentrism on both sides. The idea of cultural relativism is often used to explain the differences in practices and ideologies between cultures. In it, she explained that: The study of custom can be profitable only after certain preliminary propositions have been violently opposed. What does it mean to be a modern Native American? And, the most significant feature related to these notions and ideas is the fact that both of these come with specific sect of followers which can be specific individuals and specific nations as well.
In conclusion, I will evaluate both perspectives to present my own assessment of the response. Would that make sense to you? These two viewpoints are essentially distinct but do share a few similarities between them. Ethnocentrism is the practice of comparing other cultural practices with those of one's own and automatically finding those other cultural practices to be inferior. It only converts the anthropologist into a shadowy figure, prone to newsworthy and shallow pronouncements about the cosmic condition of the human race. The Holocaust is a clear example of one race being ethnocentric to others. Ethnocentrism Closely related to the concept of cultural relativity is the concept of ethnocentrism. When Europeans talk about coffee, they are most likely thinking about little espresso cups filled with strong coffee.
Both societies believed each of their own to be the correct way to dispose of the dead. Alternatively cultural relativists can easily adapt to new situations and overcome culture shock. Casey's view is intended as a realistic look at the function of behavior within another culture. If you went to an American high school, you may immediately understand what the groupings mean. However, people vary in their ability to adapt and overcome the effects of culture shock. Terms such as underdeveloped and primitive are prime examples of the ignorance societies use to describe another. If all surviving societies have found it necessary to impose some of the same restrictions upon the behavior of their members, this makes a strong argument that these aspects of the moral code are indispensable.
In any case, there is to be no ready-made solution to the problem; But what can we maintain today is that cultural diversity should be respected, yet international standards of justice and human rights should be considered. We have to study each ethnological specimen individually in its history and in its medium. But in private, they may reassure their off springs that their possessions are indeed very nice. For example, what Satanists find right and reasonable is damnable to Christians, and vice-versa. Does cultural relativism imply approval for all cultural practices? Those who hold the belief of Cultural Relativist, hold that all beliefs are completely relative to the individual within a cultural identity. I am a member of my work Subculture.
Nor does it lead to engagement. It was only a shroud to hide behind a wall of hatred. Indeed, most people are considered a little ethnocentric. The revolutionary efforts of groups who see themselves as downtrodden blacks, the poor, women, and young people have included deliberate efforts to foster ethnocentrism as a means of strengthening themselves. While Cultural relativism is understanding other cultures, countries, and their beliefs. It must embrace and recognize the validity of many different ways of life. This conception of culture, and principle of cultural relativism, were for Kroeber and his colleagues the fundamental contribution of anthropology, and what distinguished anthropology from similar disciplines such as and.