Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act with different intention from that of abettor. LoL I know this is entirely off topic but I had to tell someone! Danger or obstruction in public way or line of navigation Whoever, by doing any act, or by omitting to take order with any property in his possession or under his charge, causes danger, obstruction or injury to any person in any public way or public line of navigation, shall be punished with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees. Illustrations A forcibly carries or entices B away from his home in order that B may be murdered. There were allegations of siphoning of funds of Maruti Udyog Limited in favour of an individual though investment of surplus funds of this company with private individual was prohibited. Joining or continuing in unlawful assembly, knowing it has been commanded to disperse. But A has the same right of private defence against Z, which he would have if Z were not acting under that misconception. A draws a bill of exchange on himself in the name of B without B 's authority, intending to discount it as a genuine bill with a banker and intending to take up the bill on its maturity.
As be has committed both the offence of resisting the distress, and the offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt, B is liable to punishment for both these offences; and, if A knew that B was likely voluntarily to cause grievous hurt in resisting the distress A will Also be liable to punishment for each of the offences. A power-of-attorney is a document. Persons concerned in criminal act may be guilty of different offences. Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty. A sells and conveys an estate to Z. Injury which is likely to cause death and injury which is sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death i Accused inflicted 18 injuries in the arms and legs of the deceased with a gandasa. The act of pulling a woman, removing her saree, coupled with a request for sexual intercourse, is such as would be an outrage to the modesty of a woman; and knowledge, that modesty is likely to be outraged, is sufficient to constitute the offence without any deliberate intention having such outrage alone for its object.
I, for certain words w. Offence committed in place of worship, etc. Explanation 2 An investigation directed by law preliminary to a proceeding before a Court of Justice, is a stage of a judicial proceeding, though that investigation may not take place before a Court of Justice. A has committed the offence defined in this section. The burden of establishing the plea of self-defence is on the accused and the burden stands discharged by showing preponderance of probabilities in favour of that plea on the basis of the material on record; Rizan v. Explanation Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to prevent the offence from amounting to murder is a question of fact.
Her father gave her a sum of Rs. Wearing garb or carrying token used by soldier, sailor or airman. Illustration A, knowing that dacoity is about to be committed at B, falsely informs the Magistrate that a dacoity is about to be committed at C, a place in an opposite direction, and thereby misleads the Magistrate with intent to facilitate the commission of the offence. Punishment for theft Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. The said thing should be capable of being possessed by a person for the exclusive use or enjoyment as owner of that thing. Explanation The offence is committed whether the individual personated is a real or imaginary person.
But, if A sells the horse and appropriates the whole proceeds to his own use, he is guilty of an offence under this section. Illustrations a A instigates a child to put poison into the food of Z, and gives him poison for that purpose. Sentence — General Provisions of death sentence being an alternative punishment for murder is not unreasonable; Bachhan Singh v. Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor:- When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, cause a different effect from that intended by the abettor, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort property, or to constrain to an illegal act. Explanation 2 When a person causes one thing to resemble another thing, and the resemblance is such that a person might be deceived thereby, it shall be presumed, until the contrary is proved, that the person so causing the one thing to resemble the other thing intended by means of that resemblance to practice deception or knew it to be likely that deception would thereby be practiced.
Non-attendance in obedience to an order form public servant Whoever, being legally bound to attend in person or by an agent at a certain place and time in obedience to a summons, notice, order or proclamation proceeding from any public servant legally competent, as such public servant, to issue the same, intentionally omits to attend at that place or time, or departs from the place where he is bound to attend before the time at which it is lawful for him to depart, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both, or, if the summons, notice, order or proclamation is to attend in person or by agent in a Court of Justice, with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. The above exception is subject to the following provisos:— First. A here induces Z to buy and pay for the false sample of article. With the knowledge that he is likely, by such act, to cause death i In case of murder in which the conclusion of guilt is drawn by prosecution it must be fully established beyond all reasonable doubt and consistent with the guilt of the accused; S. Zuber Noor Mohammed Changwadia v. Explanation The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.
Harbouring offender who has escaped from custody or whose apprehension has been ordered Whenever any person convicted of or charged with an offence, being in lawful custody for that offence, escapes from such custody; or whenever a public servant, in the exercise of the lawful powers of such public servant, orders a certain person to be apprehended for an offence, whoever, knowing of such escape or order for apprehension, harbours of conceals that person with the intention of preventing him from being apprehended, shall be punished in the manner following that is to say,— if a capital offence. Punishment of person guilty of one of several offences, the judgment stating that it is doubtful of which. B, acting under this misconception, does not take dishonestly, and therefore does not commit theft. Extortion by putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt Whoever commits extortion by putting any person in fear of death or of grievous hurt o that person or to any other, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Wrongful confinement of person for whose liberation writ has been issued. Explanation 1 A statement is within the meaning of this section, whether it is made verbally or otherwise. Giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of capital offence.
Sentence For offence under section 306 the sentence may extend to ten years. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the internet the easiest thing to be aware of. Mere breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction, that is the time when the offence is said to have been committed. A dishonestly misappropriates the property. Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity. Commencement and continuance of the right of private defence of property The Right of private defence of property commences when a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property commences.
Abetment of suicide of child or insane person. In A jay Mitra v. Delivery of coin, possessed with knowledge that it is counterfeit Whoever, having any counterfeit coin, which at the time when he became possessed of it knew to be counterfeit, fraudulently or with intent that fraud may be committed, delivers the same to any person, or attempts to induce any person to receive it shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine. Illustrations A instigates B to murder D. Explanation 3 An investigation directed by a Court of Justice, according to law, and conducted under the authority of a Court of Justice, is a stage of a judicial proceeding, though that investigation may not take place before a Court of Justice.